Remote workers not covered by company’s state’s laws?

That’s what a federal appellate court said. The case involved an employee living and working in state A who sued her employer based in state B under B’s laws. She claimed her termination was discrimination under a law in state B. But the law said it applied to “an individual who is employed by an employer and who resides or works in this state.” Since she didn’t live or work in state B, she had no proper claim. #IdeaoftheDay